Artificial intelligence for financial budget predictions: Neural networks lead the way
Abstract
Predicting financial budgets remains an open challenge. Most studies focus on high-frequency markets, such as stock price prediction, leaving the budget domain aside. This work addresses that gap. We evaluate four artificial intelligence techniques for budget prediction: decision trees, random forests, linear regression, and multilayer perceptron. Additionally, we implement a hybrid version, MLP_GA, where the network hyperparameters are optimized using a genetic algorithm. For training and validation, we use two original datasets not publicly available: quarterly financial statements from Mexican entities, 2010-2024, and monthly financial statements from Ecuadorian organizations, 2019-2022. Both present characteristics typical of emerging economies, including episodes of high inflation, currency devaluations, fiscal policy changes, and the COVID-19 crisis. The results show that MLP_GA achieves superior predictive performance compared to the standard multilayer perceptron and the other techniques. Genetic algorithm optimization enables exploring multimodal and non-convex error surfaces, finding hyperparameter configurations –number of hidden neurons, learning rate, L2 regularization coefficient, maximum iterations, and early stopping tolerance– that significantly reduce overfitting, a critical problem when dealing with short time series of only forty to sixty quarterly observations. Statistical tests confirm that the differences are significant. The contribution is threefold. First, regarding the application domain, we present the first systematic and comparative evaluation of hybrid models combining genetic algorithms with multilayer perceptrons specifically applied to financial budget prediction, distinguishing ourselves from existing studies that focus almost exclusively on high-frequency stock market prediction. Second, regarding the geographical context, we validate our models in two Latin American economies that the literature has systematically ignored: Mexico and Ecuador, regions that represent less than one percent of the datasets used in the literature according to recent meta-analyses. Third, regarding the methodological justification, we demonstrate that genetic optimization is particularly effective for moderate-sized data, where more complex architectures like LSTMs or transformers suffer from overfitting due to their high parameter count. The combination of monthly and quarterly analysis improves model robustness, allowing accurate performance in both short-term scenarios and broader projections. These findings suggest that the MLP_GA approach can improve financial budgeting in data-constrained contexts. The paper concludes with a discussion of limitations and future research lines.
References
Bergstra, J., & Bengio, Y. (2012). Random search for hyper-parameter optimization. The journal of Machine Learning Research, 13, 281-305. https://doi.org/10.5555/2188385.2188395
Chung, H., & Shin, K. S. (2018). Genetic algorithm-optimized long short-term memory network for stock market prediction. Sustainability, 10(10), 1-18, 3765. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103765
De Rainville, F. M., Fortin, F. A., Gardner, M. A., Parizeau, M., & Gagné, C. (2012). DEAP: A Python framework for evolutionary algorithms. Companion proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2012) (pp. 85-92). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2330784.2330799
Dietterich, T. G. (2000). Ensemble methods in machine learning (Vol. 1857). MCS 2000. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45014-9_1
Gülmez, B. (2025). GA-Attention-Fuzzy-Stock-Net: An optimized neuro-fuzzy system for stock market price prediction with genetic algorithm and attention mechanism. Heliyon, 11(3), e42393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42393
Gür, Y. E., Yıldız, A., & Ünal, E. (2025). Advanced AI models for future forecasting of budget expenditures via machine learning and deep learning. Panoeconomicus, 1-36. https://doi.org/10.2298/PAN240929025G
Goodell, J. W., Kumar, S., Lim, W. M., & Pattnaik, D. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Finance: Identifying Foundations, Themes, and Research Clusters from Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 32, 100577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100577
Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press. http://www.deeplearningbook.org
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), pp. 1735-1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735
Hyndman, R. J., & Athanasopoulos, G. (2021). Forecasting: principles and practice (3rd ed.). Melbourne, Australia: OTexts. https://otexts.com/fpp3/
Khattak, B. H., Shafi, I., Khan, A. S., Flores, E. S., Lara, R. G., Samad, M. A., & Ashraf, I. (2023). A systematic survey of AI models in financial market forecasting for profitability analysis. IEEE Access, 11, pp. 125359-125380. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3330156
Li, W., & Law, K. E. (2024). Deep learning models for time series forecasting: A review. IEEE Access, 12, 92306-92327. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3422528
Lin, S., Qiao, Z., Chen, J., & Huang, Z. (2025). A hypertension early warning model combining generative adversarial networks and long short-term memory neural networks. In Web Information systems Engineering - WISE 2024 (Vol. 15463, pp. 341-356). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-1483-7_29
Liu, S. (2025). LTR-Net: A deep learning-based approach for financial data prediction and risk evaluation in enterprises. (U. o.-E. Rahul Gomes, Ed.) PLOS One, 20(8), 1-20, e0328013. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328013
Mandal Das, R., Sarkar, B., & Sarkar, A. (2025). A study on stock market analysis through artificial intelligence. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6468375
Sezer, O. B., Gudelek, M. U., & Ozbayoglu, A. M. (2020). Financial time series forecasting with deep learning: A systematic literature review: 2005-2019. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 90, 106181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106181
Shetty, S., Musa, M., & Brédart, X. (2022). Bankruptcy prediction using machine learning techniques. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15010035
Snoek, J., Larochelle, H., & Adams, R. P. (2012). Practical Bayesian optimization of machine learning algorithms. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 25, pp. 2951-2959. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1206.2944
Sun, L., Diao, S., Lyu, B., & Chen, K. (2025). Integration of genetic algorithms and trading simulation for enhanced stock price prediction and optimization of quantitative trading strategies. Proceedings of the 2024 2nd International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Communication Technology (pp. 166-171). New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3705754.3705787
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2017), 30, pp. 5998-6008. https://neurips.cc/Conferences/2017
Wilson, G. T. (2016). Book Review: Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, 5th Edition, by George E. P. Box, Gwilym M. Jenkins, Gregory C. Reinsel and Greta M. Ljung, 2015. Published by John Wiley and Sons Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, pp. 712. ISBN: 978-1-118-67502-1. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 37(5), 709-711. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsa.12194
Zhang, S., Hu, X., Gao, Y., Gao, M., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Exemplar learning and memory retrieval-based particle swarm optimization algorithm with engineering applications. Biomimetics, 10(10), 708. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10100708
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Colombiana de Computación

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
| Article metrics | |
|---|---|
| Abstract views | |
| Galley views | |
| PDF Views | |
| HTML views | |
| Other views | |








