Artificial Intelligence for Financial Budget Predictions: Neural Networks Lead the Way
Abstract
Predicting financial budgets remains an open challenge. Most studies focus on high-frequency markets, such as stock price prediction, leaving the budget domain aside. This work addresses that gap. We evaluate four artificial intelligence techniques for budget prediction: decision trees, random forests, linear regression, and multilayer perceptron. Additionally, we implement a hybrid version, MLP_GA, where the network hyperparameters are optimized using a genetic algorithm. For training and validation, we use two original datasets not publicly available: quarterly financial statements from Mexican entities (2010-2024) and monthly financial statements from Ecuadorian organizations (2019-2022). Both present characteristics typical of emerging economies, including episodes of high inflation, currency devaluations, fiscal policy changes, and the COVID-19 crisis. The results show that MLP_GA achieves superior predictive performance compared to the standard multilayer perceptron and the other techniques. Genetic algorithm optimization enables exploring multimodal and non-convex error surfaces, finding hyperparameter configurations (number of hidden neurons, learning rate, L2 regularization coefficient, maximum iterations, and early stopping tolerance) that significantly reduce overfitting, a critical problem when dealing with short time series of only forty to sixty quarterly observations. Statistical tests confirm that the differences are significant. The contribution is threefold. First, regarding the application domain, we present the first systematic and comparative evaluation of hybrid models combining genetic algorithms with multilayer perceptrons specifically applied to financial budget prediction, distinguishing ourselves from existing studies that focus almost exclusively on high-frequency stock market prediction. Second, regarding the geographical context, we validate our models in two Latin American economies that the literature has systematically ignored: Mexico and Ecuador, a region representing less than one percent of datasets used in the literature according to recent meta-analyses. Third, regarding the methodological justification, we demonstrate that genetic optimization is particularly effective for moderate-sized data, where more complex architectures like LSTMs or transformers suffer from overfitting due to their high parameter count. The combination of monthly and quarterly analysis improves model robustness, allowing accurate performance in both short-term scenarios and broader projections. These findings suggest that the MLP_GA approach can improve financial budgeting in data-constrained contexts. The paper concludes with a discussion of limitations and future research lines.
References
Bergstra, J., & Bengio, Y. (2012). Random search for hyper-parameter optimization. The journal of Machine Learning Research, 13, 281-305. https://doi.org/10.5555/2188385.2188395
Box, G. E., Jenkins, G. M., Reinsel, G. C., & Ljung, G. M. (2015). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control. In Journal of time series analysis (5th ed., Vol. 37, p. 712). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsa.12194
Chung, H., & Shin, K. S. (2018). Genetic algorithm-optimized long short-term memory network for stock market prediction. Sustainability, 10(10), p. 3765. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103765
De Rainville, F. M., Fortin, F. A., Gardner, M. A., Parizeau, M., & Gagné, C. (2012). DEAP: A Python framework for evolutionary algorithms. Companion proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2012) (pp. 1-2). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2330784.2330799
Dietterich, T. G. (2000). Ensemble methods in machine learning (Vol. 1857). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45014-9_1
Goodell, J. W., Kumar, S., Lim, W. M., & Pattnaik, D. (2021). Artificial intelligence and machine learning in finance: A bibliometric review. Research in International Business and Finance, 56, p. 101390.
Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning (Vol. 1). MIT Press. http://www.deeplearningbook.org
Gülmez, B. (2025, 02 15). GA-Attention-Fuzzy-Stock-Net: An optimized neuro-fuzzy system for stock market price prediction with genetic algorithm and attention mechanism. Heliyon, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42393
Gür, Y. E., Yıldız, A., & Ünal, E. (2025, 10 24). Advanced AI models for future forecasting of budget expenditures via machine learning and deep learning. panoeconomicus, 72(3), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.2298/PAN240929025G
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), pp. 1735-1780.
Hyndman, R. J., & Athanasopoulos, G. (2021). Forecasting: Principles and practice (3rd ed.). OTexts.
Khattak, B. H., Shafi, I., Khan, A. S., Flores, E. S., Lara, R. G., Samad, M. A., & Ashraf, I. (2023). A systematic survey of AI models in financial market forecasting for profitability analysis. IEEE Access, 11, pp. 125359-125380.
Li, W., & Law, K. E. (2024, Julio 03). Deep learning models for time series forecasting: A review. IEEE Access, 12, pp. 92306-92327. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3422528
Lin, S., Qiao, Z., Chen, J., & Huang, Z. (2025). A hypertension early warning model combining generative adversarial networks and long short-term memory neural networks. International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering. 15463, pp. 341-356. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-1483-7_29
Liu, S. (2025, 08 01). LTRNet: A deep learning-based approach for financial data prediction and risk evaluation in enterprises. PLOS One, 20(8), e0328013. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328013
Mandal Das, R., Sarkar, B., & Sarkar, A. (2025). A study on stock market analysis through artificial intelligence. SSRN.
Sezer, O. B., Gudelek, M. U., & Ozbayoglu, A. M. (2020, Mayo). Financial time series forecasting with deep learning: A systematic literature review: 2005-2019. Applied Soft Computing, 90, p. 106181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106181
Shetty, S., Musa, M., & Brédart, X. (2022). Bankruptcy prediction using machine learning techniques. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(1), p. 35.
Snoek, J., Larochelle, H., & Adams, R. P. (2012). Practical Bayesian optimization of machine learning algorithms. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 25, pp. 2951-2959. https://collaborate.princeton.edu/en/publications/practical-bayesian-optimization-of-machine-learning-algorithms/
Sun, L., Diao, S., Lyu, B., & Chen, K. (2025). Integration of genetic algorithms and trading simulation for enhanced stock price prediction and optimization of quantitative trading strategies. Proceedings of the 2024 2nd International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Communication Technology (pp. 166-171). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3705754.3705787
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, pp. 5998-6008.
Zhang, S., Hu, X., Gao, Y., Gao, M., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Exemplar learning and memory retrieval-based particle swarm optimization algorithm with engineering applications. Biomimetics, 10(10), p. 708. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10100708
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Colombiana de Computación

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








