Estado de la investigación sobre el crecimiento verde desde la perspectiva de política pública 2011 – 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29375/01240781.4660
Palabras clave: Bioeconomia, Crecimiento verde, Política pública, Revisión sistemática, Sostenibilidad, economia verde, crecimiento económico
Resumen Referencias bibliográficas Cómo citar Descargas

Resumen

Desde los inicios de la apuesta multilateral por el crecimiento verde, se han generado un sinnúmero de políticas locales, de carácter nacional, para dar respuesta a esta demanda mundial. Al mismo tiempo, ha crecido el interés de investigar y profundizar sobre la implementación y evaluación de los programas derivados de los compromisos internacionales. El objetivo de este trabajo es presentar un análisis comprensivo sobre el estado de la investigación respecto al crecimiento verde y la política pública en la última década (2011-2021). Se encuentra que la mayor parte de la producción académica se da en Europa y Asia, y los tópicos con mayor interés son los condicionantes de la efectividad de la política pública, los direccionamientos en tecnología e innovación, la inversión, la evaluación de la política y la discusión conceptual sobre la que se soporta la política. El artículo muestra el debate sobre estos asuntos.

Referencias bibliográficas

Aguilar Galeano, E., & Figueroa Espinel, J. F. (2018). La Política Pública Distrital de Ruralidad de Bogotá D.C., Implementación de una política ambiental en el marco del desarrollo humano. Editorial Uniagustiniana. https://doi.org/10.28970/9789585498167

Bagheri, M., Guevara, Z., Alikarami, M., Kennedy, C. A., & Doluweera, G. (2018). Green growth planning: A multi-factor energy input-output analysis of the Canadian economy. Energy Economics, 74, 708-720. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2018.07.015

Banerjee, O., Bagstad, K. J., Cicowiez, M., Dudek, S., Horridge, M., Alavalapati, J. R. R., Masozera, M., Rukundo, E., & Rutebuka, E. (2020). Economic, land use, and ecosystem services impacts of Rwanda’s Green Growth Strategy: An application of the IEEM+ESM platform. Science of the Total Environment, 729, 138779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138779

Baran, B. (2015). Support for renewable energy in Germany as an example of effective public policy. Oeconomia Copernicana, 6(2), 143-158. https://doi.org/10.12775/OEC.2015.017

Bassi, A. (2016). Moving Towards Integrated Policy Formulation and Evaluation: The Green Economy Model. Environmental and Climate Technologies, 16(1), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1515/rtuect-2015-0009

Béfort , N. (2020). Going beyond definitions to understand tensions within the bioeconomy: The contribution of sociotechnical regimes to contested fields. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119923

Béfort, N., & Nieddu, M. (2020). Bioéconomie : un retour historique sur deux problématisations de l’usage des ressources renouvelables. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 28(3-4), 216-225. https://doi.org/10.1051/NSS/2021011

Bentsen, N. S., Larsen, S., & Stupak, I. (2019). Sustainability governance of the Danish bioeconomy - The case of bioenergy and biomaterials from agriculture. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 9(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13705-019-0222-3/TABLES/1

Bouzaher, A., Sahin, S., & Yeldan, E. (2015). How to green: a general equilibrium investigation of environmental policies for sustained growth with an application to Turkey’s economy. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 8(1), 49-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12076-014-0124-0/TABLES/4

Bruckman, V. J., Haruthaithanasan, M., Miller, R. O., Terada, T., Brenner, A. K., Kraxner, F., & Flaspohler, D. (2018). Sustainable Forest Bioenergy Development Strategies in Indochina: Collaborative Effort to Establish Regional Policies. Forests 2018, 9(4), 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/F9040223

Burkolter, P., & Perch, L. (2014). Greening growth in the south: Practice, policies and new frontiers. South African Journal of International Affairs, 21(2), 235-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2014.941917

Caplan, A. J., & Go, D. H. (2020). Measuring the bioeconomic impacts of prolonged drought on a lake ecosystem: The case of the Great Salt Lake, Utah. Natural Resource Modeling, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/NRM.12251

Chomkhamsri, K., Mungcharoen, T., & Yuvaniyama, C. (2016). 10-year experience with the Thai national LCI database: case study of 'refinery products. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22(11), 1760-1770. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11367-016-1160-3

Costa, J., Kot, S., & Stefko, R. (2021). Carrots or Sticks: Which Policies Matter the Most in Sustainable Resource Management? Resources, 10(2), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10020012

Dauda, L., Long, X., Mensah, C. N., Salman, M., Boamah, K. B., Ampon-Wireko, S., & Kofi Dogbe, C. S. (2021). Innovation, trade openness and CO2 emissions in selected countries in Africa. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 125143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125143

Guo, L. ling, Qu, Y., Wu, C. you, & Wang, X. ling. (2018). "Identifying a pathway towards green growth of Chinese industrial regions based on a system dynamics approach". Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 128, 143-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2016.09.035

Haberl, H., Wiedenhofer, D., Virág, D., Kalt, G., Plank, B., Brockway, P., Fishman, T., Hausknost, D., Krausmann, F., Leon-Gruchalski, B., Mayer, A., Pichler, M., Schaffartzik, A., Sousa, T., Streeck, J., & Creutzig, F. (2020). A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights. Environmental Research Letters, 15(6), 065003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/AB842A

Hickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2019). Is Green Growth Possible?. New Political Economy , 25(4), 469-486. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964

Islam, M., & Managi, S. (2019). Green growth and pro-environmental behavior: Sustainable resource management using natural capital accounting in India. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 145, 126-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.027

Ivanova, Y. (2017). The Green Economy model: A promise or a reality for the Latin-American countries?. International Politics Reviews, 5, 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41312-017-0021-9

Jakob, M., & Edenhofer, O. (2014). Green growth, degrowth, and the commons. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30(3), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gru026.

Jasinevičius, G., Lindner, M., Verkerk, P. J., & Aleinikovas, M. (2017). Assessing Impacts of Wood Utilisation Scenarios for a Lithuanian Bioeconomy: Impacts on Carbon in Forests and Harvested Wood Products and on the Socio-Economic Performance of the Forest-Based Sector. Forests 2017, 8(4), 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/F8040133

Kang, M. J., & Park, H. (2011). Impact of experience on government policy toward acceptance of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in Korea. Energy Policy, 39(6), 3465-3475. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2011.03.045

Kelleher, L., Henchion, M., & O’Neill, E. (2019). Policy coherence and the transition to a bioeconomy: The case of Ireland. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11247247

Kröger, M., & Raitio, K. (2017). Finnish forest policy in the era of bioeconomy: A pathway to sustainability? Forest Policy and Economics, 77, 6-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FORPOL.2016.12.003

Leitão, J., Pereira, D., & de Brito, S. (2020). Inbound and Outbound Practices of Open Innovation and Eco-Innovation: Contrasting Bioeconomy and Non-Bioeconomy Firms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 2020, 6(4), 145. https://doi.org/10.3390/JOITMC6040145

Li, W., & Li, D. (2012). Environmental information transparency and implications for green growth in China. Public Administration and Development, 32(3), 324-334. https://doi.org/10.1002/PAD.1626

Marvik, O. J., & Philp, J. (2020). The systemic challenge of the bioeconomy: A policy framework for transitioning towards a sustainable carbon cycle economy. EMBO Reports, 21(10). https://doi.org/10.15252/EMBR.202051478

Mathews, J. A. (2015). Energizing Industrial Development: The Role of the State in 21st Century Greening Strategies. Revista Do Serviço Público, 66, 29–54. https://doi.org/10.21874/RSP.V66I0.1276

Monasterolo, I., & Raberto, M. (2019). The impact of phasing out fossil fuel subsidies on the low-carbon transition. Energy Policy, 124, 355-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2018.08.051

Monasterolo, I., Raberto, M., Monasterolo, I., & Raberto, M. (2018). The EIRIN Flow-of-funds Behavioural Model of Green Fiscal Policies and Green Sovereign Bonds. Ecological Economics, 144(C), 228-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2017.07.029

Moosmann, D., Majer, S., Ugarte, S., Ladu, L., Wurster, S., & Thrän, D. (2020). Strengths and gaps of the EU frameworks for the sustainability assessment of bio-based products and bioenergy. Energ Sustain Soc, 10(22), 2-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-020-00251-8

Mukhtarov, F., Gerlak, A., & Pierce, R. (2017). Away from fossil-fuels and toward a bioeconomy: Knowledge versatility for public policy? Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(6), 1010-1028. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16676273

Muza, O., & Debnath, R. (2021). Disruptive innovation for inclusive renewable policy in sub-Saharan Africa: A social shaping of technology analysis of appliance uptake in Rwanda. Renewable Energy, 168, 896-912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.12.091

Özbuğday, F. C., Fındık, D., Metin Özcan, K., & Başçı, S. (2020). Resource efficiency investments and firm performance: Evidence from European SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119824

Palgan, Y. V., & McCormick, K. (2016). Biorefineries in Sweden: Perspectives on the opportunities, challenges and future. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 10(5), 523-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/BBB.1672

Pandey, P. C. (2020). Circular Designing and Green Growth: Insights on Future of Sustainability. SAGE Journals, 24(1), 113-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262920903904

Pannell, D. J., Tillie, P., Rodríguez-Cerezo, E., Ervin, D., & Frisvold, G. B. (2016). Herbicide resistance : economic and environmental challenges. AgBioForum, 19(2), 136-155. https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/handle/10355/59578

Park, J. (2011). The Evolution of Green Growth Policy: An Unwelcome Intrusion on Global Environmental Governance? Journal of East Asian Economic Integration, 17(2), 207-241. https://dx.doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.2013.17.2.264

Petig, E., Choi, H. S., Angenendt, E., Kremer, P., Grethe, H., & Bahrs, E. (2019). Downscaling of agricultural market impacts under bioeconomy development to the regional and the farm level—An example of Baden-Wuerttemberg. GCB Bioenergy, 11(10), 1102-1124. https://doi.org/10.1111/GCBB.12639

Philippidis, G., Bartelings, H., Helming, J., M’barek, R., Smeets, E., & van Meijl, H. (2019). Levelling the playing field for EU biomass usage. Economic Systems Research, 31(2), 158-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2018.1564020/SUPPL_FILE/CESR_A_1564020_SM1227.DOCX

Philippidis, G., M’Barek, R., & Ferrari, E. (2016). Is “bio-based” activity a panacea for sustainable competitive growth? Energies, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/en9100806

Philp, J. (2015). Balancing the bioeconomy: Supporting biofuels and bio-based materials in public policy. Energy and Environmental Science, 8(11), 3063-3068. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ee01864a

Pitkänen, K., Antikainen, R., Droste, N., Loiseau, E., Saikku, L., Aissani, L., Hansjürgens, B., Kuikman, P. J., Leskinen, P., & Thomsen, M. (2016). What can be learned from practical cases of green economy? –studies from five European countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 666-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.08.071

Purkus, A., & Lüdtke, J. (2020). A systemic evaluation framework for a multi-actor, forest-based bioeconomy governance process: The German Charter for Wood 2.0 as a case study. Forest Policy and Economics, 113, 102113. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FORPOL.2020.102113

Quenault, B. (2020). Energy transition and the sustainability of development trajectories: Are we headed toward a mere marginal adjustment or a disruptive transformation? Mondes En Developpement, 192(4), 45-70. https://doi.org/10.3917/MED.192.0045

Rampasso, I. S., Quelhas, O. L. G., Anholon, R., Silva, D. A. L., Pontes, A. T., Miranda, J. D. A., & Dias, J. O. (2021). The Bioeconomy in emerging economies: a study of the critical success factors based on Life Cycle Assessment and Delphi and Fuzzy-Delphi methods. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2021, 26(6), 1254-1266. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11367-021-01913-1

Sampaio Neto, O. Z., Batista, E. A. C., & Meirelles, A. J. de A. (2020). Potencial de oleaginosas nativas no desenvolvimento de cadeias produtivas da biodiversidade brasileira. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 54(0), 537-559. https://doi.org/10.5380/DMA.V54I0.71934

Seidl, I., & Zahrnt, A. (2015). Social welfare politics cannot ignore growthmania. Undefined, 24(4), 232-235. https://doi.org/10.14512/GAIA.24.4.6

Smith, E., & Diggans, J. (2020). Next Steps to Grow the Bioeconomy. Health Security, 18(4), 297-302. https://doi.org/10.1089/HS.2020.0012

Söderholm, K., Bergquist, A. K., & Söderholm, P. (2017). The transition to chlorine free pulp revisited: Nordic heterogeneity in environmental regulation and R&D collaboration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 165, 1328-1339. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.07.190

Stahel, W. R. (2017). Analysis of the structure and values of the European Commission’s Circular Economy Package. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Waste and Resource Management, 170(1), 41-44. https://doi.org/10.1680/jwarm.17.00009

Teigiserova, D. A., Hamelin, L., & Thomsen, M. (2020). Towards transparent valorization of food surplus, waste and loss: Clarifying definitions, food waste hierarchy, and role in the circular economy. Science of The Total Environment, 706, 136033. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2019.136033

Toivonen, R., Vihemäki, H., & Toppinen, A. (2021). Policy narratives on wooden multi-storey construction and implications for technology innovation system governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 125, 102409. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FORPOL.2021.102409

Tong, C., Ding, S., Wang, B., & Yang, S. (2020). Assessing the target-availability of China’s investments for green growth using time series prediction. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 537, 122724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.122724

Vazquez-Brust, D. A., & Sarkis, J. (2012). Green growth: Managing the transition to a sustainable economy: Learning by doing in East Asia and Europe. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4417-2

Venkata Mohan, S., Dahiya, S., Amulya, K., Katakojwala, R., & Vanitha, T. K. (2019). Can circular bioeconomy be fueled by waste biorefineries - A closer look. Bioresource Technology Reports, 7, 100277. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BITEB.2019.100277

Wang, X., & Shao, Q. (2019). Non-linear effects of heterogeneous environmental regulations on green growth in G20 countries: Evidence from panel threshold regression. Science of the Total Environment, 660, 1346-1354. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2019.01.094

Wang, Y., Hu, H., Dai, W., & Burns, K. (2021). Evaluation of industrial green development and industrial green competitiveness: Evidence from Chinese urban agglomerations. Ecological Indicators, 124, 107371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107371

Zhou, Z., Wu, H., & Song, P. (2019). Measuring the resource and environmental efficiency of industrial water consumption in China: A non-radial directional distance function. Journal of Cleaner Production, 240, 118169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118169

Cómo citar
Diaz-Ariza, D. M., Aguilar Galeano, E., & García Castiblanco, C. P. (2023). Estado de la investigación sobre el crecimiento verde desde la perspectiva de política pública 2011 – 2021. Reflexión Política, 25(51), 31–44. Recuperado a partir de https://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/article/view/4660

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Portada No.52
Publicado
2023-06-30
Número
Vol. 25 Núm. 51 (2023): Reflexión Política (enero - junio)
Sección
Artículos

Derechos de autor 2023 Reflexión Política

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.

Métricas

Estadísticas de artículo
Vistas de resúmenes
Vistas de PDF
Descargas de PDF
Vistas de HTML
Otras vistas
QR Code
Crossref Cited-by logo

Algunos artículos similares: